Eagle Forum of California

Legislation


Home

Links: for information about local units of Eagle Forum of California.
Orange County
Long Beach
Sacramento
Sonoma County
Los Altos


Eagle Issues links to our issue oriented pages.
Court Watch
Vaccine Research
Education
Home School
Legislation
Environment
United Nations


Links: 
Eagle Forum Is our parent organization.

Capitol Resource Institute is an outstanding source of information on activity in the California legislature.

Life Priority Network For information about the crucial life  issues of abortion, infanticide, and euthanasia

Campaign for California Familiesa  family defense organization serving families in California and across America

 

ALERT: 

2005 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES

THIS IS YOUR YEAR TO SOAR WITH THE EAGLES!  HOW YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE –

LEGISLATION 101

Eagle Forum of California encourages every member to get involved; it is our responsibility as U.S. citizens.  The goal in affecting public-policy debate is to present your opinion on a given issue persuasively. The most common ways to directly influence public policy include:

·        Write letters to elected officials. Sample letters will be posted on this website to assist you.

·        Send e-mails and faxes to elected officials. Make phone calls. E- mail is nice, but it's too easy to hit the delete button. We strongly recommend sending faxes because it gives them something they have to hold in their hands and READ.

·        Make phone calls. Be sure you understand the issue and be prepared to support your position.

·        Write letters to the editor of your local newspaper.

·        Get involved in the actual election process by voting, volunteer to work at election polling places, volunteer for local candidates in their campaigns, serve as a party precinct committeeman or woman, or take that step of faith and run for elective office.

·        Attend public meetings, hearings, school board meetings, or issue forums.

·        Join a local Eagle Forum Chapter! Our Mission is to enable conservative and pro-family men and women to participate in the process of self-government and public policy-making so America will continue to be a land that values individual liberty, respect for family integrity, public and private virtue and private enterprise. Eagle Forum is a non-partisan, non-sectarian organization of men and women who believe in God, Family and Country. Eagle Forum members are dedicated to preserving the political, economic and social principles upon which our Nation was founded. Our achievements have proven that citizen-volunteers can determine government policies in the United States, and effectively communicate to the public and the media the principles for which we stand. Your membership will help lend credibility to our effort to Protect our children for survival of America.

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATION

AB 19 Homosexual Marriage - OPPOSE AB 19 (Leno) Dubbed the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act, attempts to circumvent Proposition 22, which says marriage is defined as one man, one woman. AB 19 instead declares that marriage "is a personal relation arising out of a civil contract between 2 persons."

AB 21 Pharmacists. Contraceptives - OPPOSE AB 21 (Levine) This bill prohibits pharmacists from declining to dispense prescribed contraceptives or emergency contraceptives.

AB 33 Contact with Minor - SUPPORT AB 33 (Runner) This bill would amend current law by raising the age from 12 to 16 related to the prohibition of adults luring children away for any purpose. Further, the bill allows for the confiscation of the offender's computer.

AB 103 School and Contraceptives - OPPOSE AB 103 (Cohn) This bill would prohibit any school district from preventing a health clinic to come on campus for the sole purpose of distributing contraceptives to students. There is no provision for notifying parents or rules that say when or how the health clinic can have access to school grounds or to students.

AB 171 Comprehensive Pupil Learning Support System - OPPOSE AB 171 (Yee) This bill would create a learning system that includes "braiding" education and social services into a single system in order for students to be better learners, "good parents, good neighbors, good workers, and good citizens of the world." The bill requires teachers to address a wide-range of student problems, including social, emotional, intellectual, and behavioral development "within the context of the classroom." It includes expanding before-, during- and after-school programs, as well as providing transitional support in moving students from "post school living and work." It also requires that schools establish an emergency crisis team, enhance home involvement, increase outreach to the community, and provide training, screening, and maintaining volunteers to assist school staff "in enhancing pupil motivation and capability for school learning." Data collection procedures, accountability reviews, and effective school mechanisms to assist families with decision making are also part of the bill's stated goals.

AB 172 Universal Preschool - OPPOSE AB 172 (Chan) This bill is a four-page outline restating the Legislature's intent to create a statewide universal preschool system based on several bills that were sidelined last year. The bill states that California should offer a state-funded preschool system for all families regardless of income. This system is to based on public school standards, pay preschool teachers at the same rate as public school teachers, connect families to a variety of other resources including health care, and integrate preschool with "full-time daycare as seamlessly as possible."

ACA 3 Marriage. One Man, One Woman - SUPPORT ACA 3 (Haynes) This bill would place an initiative on the ballot amending the state Constitution to provide that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. It further limits the rights, responsibilities, benefits, and obligations of marriage to a man and a woman. SCA 1 is an exact duplicate of ACA 3, but was introduced in the Senate.

ACR 1 Stem-Cell Conflict-of-Interest - OPPOSE ACR1 (Negrete-McLeod) This resolution would urge the newly formed stem-cell commission willingly to develop "robust conflict-of-interest standards for its members," that these standards be in "compliance with the standards" of open-meeting laws, and that the commission "report to the Legislature" regarding the implementation of the Assembly's resolution. (A resolution has no force or effect of law; it merely states the wishes of the Assembly.)

AJR 3 Abortion. Celebrating Roe v. Wade - OPPOSE AJR 3 (Cohn) This is a "joint resolution" stating that both houses of California's Legislature urge Congress and the President to "protect and uphold the intent and substance of" Roe v. Wade (abortion). The original version of the resolution, which was amended January 13, also "encourage(d) all Americans to participate in the national celebration" of the "March for Women's Lives."

SB 18 Stem Cell. Amendments to Initiative - SUPPORT (Ortiz) The intent of this bill should be supported; however, do so with caution and even with a little suspicion because of the circumstances. SB 18 seeks to amend Proposition 71 by requiring that the newly formed stem-cell commission submit to open-meeting laws, requiring doctors to disclose to women receiving fertility treatment that unused eggs can be used for research and receive consent from the woman before her discarded eggs are used, and further requires that the state participate in any profits realized from the use of public funds. Forget for the moment that the original initiative passed by the people, Prop. 71, specifically prohibits any amendments or changes by the state Legislature for a period of three years (any changes must be approved by the voters since the initial proposition was by the people.) The bill's author actively campaigned for Prop. 71 but failed to raise her concerns during the campaign. Yet she now says that the initiative "falls glaringly short in providing key protections to the public's pocketbook" and "is silent on issues of public accountability and oversight."   Senator Deborah Ortiz recently made known her plans to run for statewide office in two years and said she has hired a press secretary to raise her name recognition in the state.

SB 60 Driver License. Illegal Immigrants - OPPOSE SB 60 (Cedillo) This is a repeat of two previous attempts to legalize drivers' licenses for illegal immigrants. The bill repeals state law that now requires a person applying for a driver's license to submit a social security card or other identification that shows proof that the person is in the United States legally. Instead, SB 60 requires the DMV to accept various forms of other identification issued by foreign countries as to the identity of a person. It also requires fingerprints for criminal background checks. However, the bill does not include provisions for a license that is different in any manner from that carried by legal residents. This has been a sticking point with Gov. Schwarzenegger in the past

SCA 1 Marriage. One Man, One Woman - SUPPORT SCA 1 (Morrow) This is a Constitutional amendment that would place an initiative on the ballot amending the state Constitution to provide that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. It further limits the rights, responsibilities, benefits, and obligations of marriage to a man and a woman. ACA 3 is an exact duplicate of SCA 1, but was introduced in the Assembly.

FEDERAL LEGISLATION

Pro-life members of Congress have reintroduced legislation requiring women be informed about the pain their unborn children will experience if they undergo late-term abortions.

Sen. Sam Brownback, R.-Kan., and Rep. Chris Smith, R.-N.J., introduced on consecutive days the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act, S. 51 in the Senate and H.R. 356 in the House of Representatives. Brownback offered his bill with 31 cosponsors Jan. 26, one day after Smith presented his measure. The House bill has 85 cosponsors.

The bill has two provisions: 1) An abortion doctor would have to provide a woman at least 20 weeks into pregnancy with scientific evidence about the severe pain her unborn child would experience during the procedure and 2) if the woman still decides to have an abortion, the doctor would be required to offer anesthesia for her unborn baby in order to reduce his pain.

Angela M. Azevedo
Secretary/State Legislative Director
Eagle Forum of California
916/683-6183
 

 


 
 
 

 


 

(C)2002-2004 Eagle Forum of California